Why?
When approaching a task, we may often ask how to accomplish it. How to solve a problem? How to innovate? How to change the world? We believe the first question should be why? Why solve a problem? Why change the world? Why unify Norden?
For having the answer to why shapes the answer to how in profound ways.
Norden is a cradle of values and virtues that are not too common everywhere in the world. Preserving these values and virtues is a fundamental why for us for promoting Nordic unity.
We also believe that a unified Norden can have a greater role to play as a steady-handed force for good in a world at risk. In an era of growing instability, we believe a more unified Norden can serve as a beacon of moderation, a pioneer of peacemaking, and a model of resilient, democratic cooperation.
You can explore our reasons and our vision in more detail below.
Geopolitics & Security
-
Why Nordic unification:
A unified Norden has the geopolitical weight to protect its Arctic interests.Why not just the EU:
The EU has limited focus and presence in the Arctic. In this region, we are largely on our own — surrounded by superpowers.Read more:
As the Arctic Ocean stays ice-free for longer periods due to climate change, new trade routes are opening — particularly the Northern Sea Route, which cuts shipping distance between Europe and Asia by up to 40%. This region is becoming central to global trade, military strategy, and natural resource extraction. World powers like Russia, China, and the US are increasing their presence. While Nordic countries participate in the Arctic Council, the Council lacks the authority to address security dynamics. A unified Norden would have the geopolitical weight, coordinated Arctic policy, and naval capability to defend its interests, ensure sustainable development, and help shape Arctic governance. Relying on the EU is insufficient, as it has limited Arctic presence and conflicting internal interests. -
Why Nordic unification:
A unified Norden is a resilient bloc in a turbulent world.
Why not just the EU?
The EU’s future and unity is uncertain; a Nordic fallback is prudent.
Read more:
The post-WWII multilateral order is being replaced by power blocs and transactional diplomacy. With NATO strained and the EU's future uncertain, small nations are increasingly vulnerable to coercion and marginalization. A unified Nordic bloc could provide its own backbone: coordinated diplomacy, military readiness, and resilience strategies. It would serve as a stabilizer in Northern Europe. This doesn't replace NATO or the EU, but supplements them — and provides a fallback if those institutions falter.
-
Why Nordic unification:
United Norden can offer sustainable, democratic investment — unlike China or the US.
Why not just the EU:
The EU is too slow, too broad, and too far removed to act with the speed, unity, and regional understanding that Greenland — and the Arctic — require.
Read more:
Greenland holds untapped reserves of rare earth minerals, oil, and gas — resources increasingly vital for the global green transition and high-tech industry. As global interest grows, especially from China and the United States, Greenland faces pressure to align with major powers. Denmark alone lacks the investment capacity and infrastructure support to offer a meaningful alternative. A united Norden could jointly invest in Greenland’s development responsibly, supporting democracy, local autonomy, and sustainability. This would ensure Western alignment while avoiding extractive or coercive relationships. The EU cannot act at this scale or with such regional specificity.
Economy, Industry & Innovation
-
Why Nordic unification:
To attract global talent, a unified Norden offers a far more compelling proposition than any single Nordic country alone.Why not just the EU?:
EU migration flows toward major economies like Germany, leaving the Nordics sidelined in the global talent race.Read more:
All Nordic countries are facing demographic decline: more retirees, fewer workers. This threatens public services and long-term economic competitiveness. A unified Nordic confederation could become the world’s most attractive region for skilled immigrants, entrepreneurs, and families — with a single labor market, single visa system, and a common Nordic entrepreneurial ecosystem. Today, fragmented immigration, tax, and business systems deter talent. While the EU enables mobility, it doesn’t help us stand out — and we’re competing within it. Talent flows toward the largest economies, not north. Meanwhile, the United States — once the default destination for global ambition — is becoming less stable and less welcoming. The Nordics can offer something better: a high-trust, high-opportunity society where people come not just to work, but to build a good life. -
Why Nordic unification:
A common Nordic entrepreneurial ecosystem, and industrial policy would give us scale.
Why not just the EU:
The EU is too broad and slow to meet Nordic needs. A unified Norden gives us speed, focus, and a stronger voice — both within the EU and beyond.
Read more:
Global competition is intensifying — not just in trade, but in technology, data and green energy. To stay competitive, nations need scale and coordination. As separate economies, the Nordics are often outmatched in global negotiations and overlooked by major investors. Unification would allow for shared industrial policy, a pan-Nordic innovation strategy, and stronger global market presence.
-
By aligning their efforts and reducing duplication, the Nordic countries could unlock growth beyond what they achieve separately.
EU economic strategy lacks regional tailoring.
Despite close economic ties, Nordic countries still have regulatory differences, tax variations, and administrative barriers. This reduces efficiency and deters cross-border entrepreneurship and investment. A unified Norden could unleash growth and result in productivity gains.
Identity & Civilization-Level Thinking
-
Why Nordic unification:
Norden can become that — trusted, fair, democratic, and green.Why not just the EU?:
The EUs’ internal divisions prevent bold leadership.Read more:
As authoritarianism rises and liberal democracies falter, the Nordics still embody integrity, trust, equality, and transparency. But we are too small to lead by example individually. Together, we could serve as the world’s democratic lighthouse — the 'shining city on a hill' of the 21st century. The EU is too large, slow, and politically entangled to fulfill this role effectively. -
Why Nordic unification:
Because together we have the trust, values, and capacity to lead in a time of global instability.
Why not just the EU:
Because the EU lacks the coherence and deep trust needed for long-term stewardship.
Read more:
The coming era will be marked by overlapping crises — ecological, geopolitical, democratic. The world is entering a phase where stability, trust, and principled leadership will become rare and invaluable.
Across much of the world, the Nordics are seen as neutral, trustworthy, and committed to civility. These qualities — along with our shared Nordic values of human dignity, sustainability, and reason — have made us pioneers in peace mediation and institutional innovation.
In times of systemic uncertainty, the world needs a steady-handed steward of peace and principle. We can be that. And our capacity to be that brings with it a moral obligation.
As one unified political entity, the Nordics could lead on moral, environmental, and institutional resilience — demonstrating that trust, freedom, and cooperation still work.
The EU has potential, but its internal divisions make bold, experimental leadership difficult. Global systems — climate, democracy, peace — are too fragile for hesitation. Norden has the coherence, trust, and values needed to act. But we cannot meet this responsibility alone.
-
Why Nordic unification:
There are few, if any, real downsides — only upside.
Why not just the EU:
The EU is not built to serve Nordic interests specifically.
Read more:
We already share a deep foundation of practical cooperation: Our economies are interconnected,
we conduct joint military exercises, coordinate through NORDEFCO, and are aligning rapidly under NATO.
Our institutions function with a high degree of trust and interoperability.
And culturally, we are remarkably aligned: we share the same foundational values, virtues and principles.In many ways, we already act as one — just without the formal structure.
Unification, then, isn’t a radical leap — it’s the logical next step.
We’re not starting from zero. We’re solidifying what already works.
The risk is low. The infrastructure, both material and relational, is largely already in place.
The upside? Greater strategic autonomy, stronger global influence, more efficient governance, and a common voice in a world that needs one.