Beyond Friendship: Rethinking the Nordic Contract
Nordic cooperation must evolve from symbolic friendship into strategic alignment. As the Helsinki Treaty undergoes revision for the first time in decades, we outline three essential upgrades – in foreign policy, defence, and economic coordination.
The Helsinki Treaty, signed in 1962, has long served as the quiet backbone of Nordic cooperation. It bound together nations already close in culture and values, encouraging consultation, harmonization, and cross-border ties in areas like law, education, and the environment. It was a pragmatic achievement of its time. It was soft, intergovernmental, and aspirational.
But that time has passed.
We now live in an era defined by fragmentation and realignment. The geopolitical world is becoming multipolar and increasingly volatile. Climate change is no longer abstract. The Arctic is militarized. Global supply chains are fragile. Even democracy itself is under pressure, from within and without.
In response, the Helsinki Treaty is being revised for the first time in over 30 years. The current proposals led by a Nordic Council task force are thoughtful and overdue. They rightly include new areas like hybrid threats, cyber resilience, and youth participation. They suggest naming our shared values explicitly, and they call for expanded cooperation in welfare, culture, and climate.
These are welcome steps.
But they are not enough.
The central claim of the Helsinki Treaty Report, produced by the Aurora Center, is that we must go further. We should not merely update the treaty’s wording. We should reimagine its role.
From Friendship to Strategy
The original treaty was built on trust, and that trust remains a rare Nordic asset. But the challenges we now face require more than trust. They require the capacity to act together at scale, with purpose and speed.
This means treating Nordic cooperation not as cultural affinity, but as strategic alignment.
The Aurora Center calls for three core upgrades to the treaty:
Foreign Policy Alignment – to give the Nordics a cohesive voice in a fracturing world. This includes co-located embassies, joint development policies, and a shared diplomatic strategy rooted in Nordic values.
Defence and Civil Security – now that all Nordic countries are in NATO, the treaty must reflect this new reality. Coordinated procurement, infrastructure, and civil preparedness are not optional—they are strategic necessities.
Economic Coordination – to reduce duplication, build strategic industries, and pool investment capacity. We propose a unified Nordic entrepreneurial ecosystem, common investment tools, and cross-border infrastructure for innovation.
These proposals are not federalist. They respect national sovereignty. But they reject the status quo, where ambition is stalled by procedural caution.
A Window of Opportunity
Treaty revisions do not come often. This is likely the last major chance in a generation to reshape the framework of Nordic cooperation. The revision is already underway, but the window is closing.
We have the trust. We have the tools. What we lack is the political will.
The full Helsinki Treaty Report outlines a practical path toward a stronger, more resilient Nordic region. It includes concrete treaty language, institutional reforms, and implementation mechanisms designed not for idealists, but for realists.
This is not about nostalgia. It is about capacity. And it begins now.
The full report will be published shortly. Sign up to our newsletter to receive it directly and be part of this historic conversation.